The 53rd Annual Scientific Congress of the Korean Association of Orthodontists PASSION FOR A LONG JOURNEY :
Nature vs Nurture

Online
November 5(Thu) - 6(Fri), 2020
Precongress: November 1(Sun) / VOD: November 7(Sat) - 8(Sun)

Current stream of orthodontics

The truth about treatment outcomes - Why we fail to achieve ideal outcomes
Dr. Larry P. Tadlock
  • Larry P. Tadlock, DDS, MS, Clinical Associate Professor
  • Department of Orthodontics
  • Texas A&M University College of Dentistry
  • 214-828-8314 ltadlock@tamhsc.edu
  • PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION
  • 1975 - 1979
    Baylor University (Accounting major, pre-dental)
  • 1979 - 1980
    University of Texas - Arlington
    Degree - Bachelor of Science, Biology (BS)
  • 1980 - 1984
    Baylor College of Dentistry
    Degree - Doctor of Dental Surgery (DDS)
  • 1986 - 1988
    University of Texas School of Dentistry - Houston
    Certificate in Orthodontics and Degree - Master of Science, Biomedical Sciences (MS)
  • EMPLOYMENT HISTORY
  • 1988 - 1989
    Private Practice, Orthodontics (Associateship) Dallas, Desoto
  • 1989 - 2018
    Private Practice, Orthodontics (solo, owner) North Richland Hills/Keller, TX
  • 2000 - 2014
    Part-time clinical faculty, Clinical Assistant Professor, Texas A&M University College of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics
  • 2014 - 2018
    Program Director, Clinical Assistant Professor, Texas A&M University College of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics
  • 2018 - Present
    Program Director, Clinical Associate Professor (as of Sept, 2018), Texas A&M University College of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics

Throughout our profession's history, orthodontists have claimed to produce quality outcomes, but have we? In 1934, Dr. Allan Brodie wrote that at that time orthodontists were not producing better outcomes than dentists. How do we know if we are? Outcomes assessments are necessary to understand the efficacy of our treatment. This is just as true for orthodontics as it is for the business world. Orthodontic outcomes assessments published in peer-reviewed journals demonstrate that a significant number of patient outcomes fail to reach generally accepted goals. Numerous iatrogenic factors may increase the likelihood of treatment failures, including a failure to: 1) set specific, evidence-based facial, skeletal and dental treatment objectives, 2) a focus on techniques instead of science, 3) establish proper A-P anchorage, 4) control the vertical dimension, 5) regularly assess treatment outcomes. Understanding that orthodontics is at its core a science, and using that science in our treatment significantly improve our treatment outcomes.